The Medial Caesura Declined in Schubert’s Sonata-Form Expositions


  • Gabriel Navia Universidade Federal da Integração Latino-Americana



The medial caesura (MC) is a mid-expositional break that divides a sonata-form exposition into two parts. It acts as a tonal and formal proposition, a suggested plan of action that, to be accepted, requires a convincing S-candidate and a key other than the tonic. Failure to launch any of the typical S-opening types or to move away from the tonic after the MC may indicate that the proposed gesture is being retrospectively declined, as if the subsequent music were unable, or perhaps refused, to move past the MC effectively. This situation often results in the reopening of pre-MC space, suggesting a return to either P or TR and an eventual articulation of a new, rhetorically stronger MC. In this paper, I investigate Schubert’s handling of declined MCs within sonata expositions, demonstrating how the strategy’s formal and expressive outcomes may be directly associated with a given MC pair. I examine four different declined/accepted MC pairs, organized as follows: 1) a declined Classical MC is followed by another Classical MC; 2) a declined MC in a non-normative key is followed by a Classical MC; 3) a declined Classical MC is followed by an MC in a non-normative key; and 4) a declined MC in a non-normative key is followed by an MC in the same key or in another non-normative key. The conclusion shows that declined/accepted pairs involving tonally unconventional MCs often implicate formal and tonal complications that require some kind of correction or compensation, resulting, for instance, in a multimodular S, a modulatory CF, or a direct motion to the EEC. Interestingly, even when dealing with the Classical/Classical pair, Schubert constantly avoided the Classical deployment sequence, experimenting with innovative strategies that impacted the exposition’s layout in some way. It seems that, in Schubert, the declined-MC strategy exceeds its inherent rhetorical (and coloristic) function, frequently incorporating structural significance.

Biografia do Autor

Gabriel Navia, Universidade Federal da Integração Latino-Americana

Gabriel Navia é Doutor em Teoria e Análise Musical pela University of Arizonae Mestre em Performance Musical (violão) pela mesma universidade.Durante o seu doutorado, dedicou-se ao estudo da forma sonata na música de Franz Schubert. Seu trabalho de pesquisa atual está focado principalmente no estudo da harmonia da música popular e à análise formal de alguns gêneros latino-americanos. De 2007 a 2013, Gabriel Navia foi professor assistente nos cursos de violão e de teoria musical na University of Arizona; de 2013 a 2014, foi professor substituto na Universidade Federal de Uberlândia; e, desde 2014 atua como professor de violão e disciplinas teóricas na Universidade Federal da Integração Latino-Americana (UNILA).


Beach, David. 2017. Schubert’s Mature Instrumental Music: A Theorist’s Perspective. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.

Black, Brian. 1996. Schubert’s Apprenticeship in Sonata Form: The Early String Quartets. PhD diss., McGill University.

___________. 2015. Schubert’s ‘Deflected-Cadence’ Transitions and the Classical Style. In: Steven Vande Moortele, Julie Pedneault-Deslauriers, and Nathan John Martin (eds.) Formal Functions in Perspective: Essays on Musical Form from Haydn to Adorno. Rochester: University of Rochester Press, p. 165–197.

Caplin, William. 1998. Classical Form: A Theory of Formal Functions for the Instrumental Music of Haydn, Mozart, and Beethoven. New York: Oxford University Press.

___________; Hepokoski, James; Webster, James. 2009. Musical Form, Forms, and Formenlehre. Edited by Pieter Bergé. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

___________. 2013. Analyzing Classical Form: An Approach for the Classroom. New York: Oxford University Press.

___________; Martin, Nathan John. 2016. The ‘Continuous Exposition’ and the Concept of Subordinate Theme. Music Analysis 35/1, p. 4–43.

Hepokoski, James; Darcy, Warren. 1997. The Medial Caesura and Its Role in the Eighteenth-Century Sonata Exposition. Music Theory Spectrum 19/2, p. 115–154.

___________. 2006. Elements of Sonata Theory: Norms, Types, and Deformations in the Late-Eighteenth-Century Sonata. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hunt, Graham. 2009. The Three-Key Trimodular Block and its Classical Precedents: Sonata Expositions of Schubert and Brahms. Intégral 23, p. 65–119.

Moortele, Steven Vande. 2017. The Romantic Overture and Musical Form from Rossini to Wagner. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Navia, Gabriel. 2016. The Medial Caesura in Schubert’s Sonata Forms: Formal and Rhetorical Complications. Tucson, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona.

Rosen, Charles. 1988. Sonata Forms. Rev. ed. New York: Norton.

Schmalfeldt, Janet. 2011. In the Process of Becoming: Analytic and Philosophical Perspectives on Form in Early Nineteenth-Century Music. New York: Oxford University Press.

Venegas, Gabriel. 2013. Formal Reinterpretation in Schubert’s Works for Piano Solo. Tucson, MM thesis, University of Arizona.

Webster, James. 1978. Schubert’s Sonata Forms and Brahms’s First Maturity. Part 1. 19th-Century Music 2/1, p. 18–35.

Westrup, Jack. 1969. Schubert Chamber Music. Washington: University of Washington Press.

Whaples, Miriam. 1968. On Structural Integration in Schubert’s Instrumental Works. Acta Musicologica 40/2, p. 186–195.

Wollenberg, Susan. 1998. “Schubert’s Transitions.” In Brian Newbould (ed.) Schubert Studies. Aldershot: Ashgate.

___________. 2007. “Schubert’s Poetic Transitions.” In: Xavier Hascher (ed.) Le style instrumental de Schubert: Sources, Analyse, Evolution. Paris: Sorbonne.

___________. 2011. Schubert’s Fingerprints: Studies in the Instrumental Works. Farnham: Ashgate.